Personal tools
 
Sections
Goals
Clean and Sufficient Water Preservation of Wild Lands, Habitat & Biodiversity
Indicator Maps
Goals
Climate Protection Responsible Land Use Sustainable Transportation
Indicator Maps
Goals
Food Security Health Equity Income Equity
Indicator Maps
Goals
Healthy Living Choices Quality Educational Opportunities
Indicator Maps
You are here:   Home Built Environment Annual Traffic Delay per Peak Traveler
Document Actions

Indicator: Annual Traffic Delay per Peak Traveler

Data and Data Discussion provided by Communities Count

Figure 1: Annual Traffic Delay per Peak Hour Traveler Among 5 U.S. Cities

Figure 2: On-Time Performance, King County Metro Transit

Sustainability Snapshot:

In the U.S, drivers waste billions of gallons of fuel while idling in traffic. Moreover, congestion causes stress and reduces the amount of time spent with family and friends and in recreational pursuits. It’s estimated that the total cost of delays is Central Puget Sound is over $1.5 billion per year. (1) This includes both loss of productive time by travelers as well as higher vehicle operating costs due to congestion.

Data Discussion

The Indicator Defined

Annual Traffic Delay Per Peak Traveler.

Data Interpretation/Evaluation

According to 2003 survey data, traffic congestion has decreased during peak hours (6 to 9 a.m. and 4 to 7 p.m.) in Seattle, compared to 1996. The annual traffic delay per peak traveler has decreased since 1996 from 59 to 46 hours in 2003. The improvement may be due to new bottleneck relief projects, increase in HOV lanes, and congestion reduction strategies. (Figure 1)

Cities with a similar population size, such as San Diego, Denver, Minneapolis and Baltimore, have had increasingly worse traffic delays during peak traffic time.  Seattle is one of seven metropolitan areas that experienced declines in annual delay per traveler.

Data Source and Limitations

Annual traffic delay data are from the Urban Mobility Study developed by the Texas Transportation Institute. Information on intensity of peak hours and reason for decrease in traffic congestion was from David Schrank, at the Texas Transportation Institute. Data regarding health problems associated with lack of exercise were from the Surface Transportation Policy Project. Additional data on declines of traffic delays between 1992 and 2002 comes from a September 8, 2004 Seattle Times articles.

collapse all

Additional Resources

  • Urban Area Report for Mobility 1992 to 2005
    This performance measure report gives detailed traffic statistics for the Seattle metropolitan area and compares it to congestion conditions in other large metropolitan areas. Published by the Texas Transportation Institute of Texas A&M University.